Requests (UXPROD-790)

[UXPROD-236] Requests Permissions (Advanced/Action-Based) Created: 21/Feb/18  Updated: 17/Mar/21  Resolved: 02/Jul/19

Status: Closed
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Requests

Type: New Feature Priority: P2
Reporter: Cate Boerema (Inactive) Assignee: Cate Boerema (Inactive)
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: requests, resourceaccess, split
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Issue links:
Relates
relates to UXPROD-1279 Requests Permissions (Simple) Closed
relates to UXPROD-1808 Requests Permissions (Basic CRU) Closed
relates to UXPROD-1839 Cancel Request Permission (Action-Based) In Refinement
Epic Link: Requests
Analysis Estimate: Medium < 5 days
Analysis Estimator: Tania Fersenheim
Front End Estimate: Small < 3 days
Front End Estimator: Matt Connolly
Front-End Confidence factor: Medium
Back End Estimate: Small < 3 days
Back End Estimator: Marc Johnson
Development Team: Prokopovych
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R2
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R1
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R1
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R1
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R2
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R1
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R1
Rank: hbz (TBD): R1
Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): R1
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): R1
Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): R1
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R1
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R2

 Description   

Purpose: to implement staff permissions for requests, including:

  • Create request - standard CRUD-based permission CB: Moved to UXPROD-1808 Closed
  • Edit request - standard CRUD-based permission CB: Moved to UXPROD-1808 Closed
  • Cancel request - action-based permission (needs architectural support) CB: Moved to UXPROD-1839 In Refinement
  • Re-set request to “Open-not yet filled” - action-based permission (needs architectural support) also blocked by feature to Re-set request to “Open-not yet filled” CB: Moved to UXPROD-897 In Refinement
  • Request policy overrides (e.g. create a delivery request for a patron not allowed to have a delivery) - action-based permission (needs architectural support) also blocked by Fulfilling delivery requests ( UXPROD-113 Closed ) and Allow Request Policy to Control Request Fulfillment Options ( UXPROD-1561 Draft ) CB: Moved to UXPROD-113 Closed
  • Reordering the queue - action-based permission (needs architectural support) also blocked by Request Queue (Dedicated Request Queue Page with Re-Order Capabilities) CB: Moved to UXPROD-1242 Closed
  • Checkout override (proceed with the check out) (covered in UXPROD-239 Closed )
  • Bulk actions (in combo with other permissions) - blocked by bulk actions epic. removing from this feature.


 Comments   
Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 09/Oct/18 ]

Chalmers only need one level of permission for requests.

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Nov/18 ]

Thanks Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se), I broke this out into two features. UXPROD-1279 Closed now covers just the simple "all permissions" permission for requests. It would be great if you could revise your rankings accordingly.

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Nov/18 ]

Not sure if this feature is blocked by Action-Based Permissions or not so I am not marking it blocked, but I am marking it related to UXPROD-1828 Closed .

Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 21/Nov/18 ]

Chalmers needs Checkout override (proceed with the check out) permission pretty soon after Go-live, but not the others.

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 21/Nov/18 ]

Thanks Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se).

Chalmers needs Checkout override (proceed with the check out) permission pretty soon after Go-live, but not the others.

I would have actually thought that check out override permission would be related to loans, not requests. So, part of UXPROD-239 Closed and/or UXPROD-1251 Closed . Am I missing something, Tania Fersenheim and Emma Boettcher?

Comment by Emma Boettcher [ 23/Nov/18 ]

No Cate Boerema, that seems right, and UXPROD-239 Closed is ranked according to what Theodor says here.

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 02/Jul/19 ]

This feature has been broken up and will be closed as a duplicate.

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 02/Jul/19 ]

We discussed this in the RA SIG feature re-ranking and decided we need to break this feature down. I have done that and am closing this as a duplicate of those other features.

RA SIG discussion at 42:29 of this recording https://drive.google.com/file/d/15RbACU90Ln4JAazWSz0iM4ZSYia6mIaK/view?usp=sharing

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:06:42 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.