Consortia/Multiple Libraries (Single Tenant)
(UXPROD-872)
|
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Consortia/Multiple Libraries (Single Tenant) |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Owen Stephens | Assignee: | Owen Stephens |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | agreements, erm, licenses, round_iv | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Consortia/Multiple Libraries (Single Tenant) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Bienenvolk | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (ERM Jun 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MI State-Lib of MI (Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
In a situation where multiple teams, libraries or institutions share a single Folio tenant, it maybe desirable to limit access to specific Agreements and Licenses to specific users or groups of users, similar to the Acquisition Units that can be applied to Orders & Invoices A typical example of this situation could be a consortia of libraries/institutions sharing a single folio tenant. However it could also apply in other situations where permissions to view or edit specific agreements/licenses is limited to a subset of users |
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 18/Nov/19 ] |
|
Owen Stephens is there an epic this can be assigned to? Thanks |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 20/Nov/19 ] |
|
Owen Stephens, I assigned this Feature to
|
| Comment by Molly Driscoll [ 15/Sep/21 ] |
|
Owen Stephens do you have a sense of when this feature might be prioritized? We have a few current and several incoming consortia we are working with and this feature comes up fairly frequently in questions I'm asked. |
| Comment by Molly Driscoll [ 08/Nov/21 ] |
|
Owen Stephens this question just came up again – any idea of where this is falling in terms of priority / dev timeline? |