Users App
(UXPROD-784)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | R1 2021 | Parent: | Users App |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | patty.wanninger | Assignee: | Annika Schröer |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | round_iv, ui-only, users | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Users App | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Small < 3 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Small < 3 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Leipzig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
In order to create efficient workflows, the searching for Users in User Management needs additional features: Wireframe: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v9BAMunYLCF8VAJB8IY45btEEdnTqYiR/view?usp=sharing Per discussion on 2020-06-29, RA SIG thinks this is higher priority than Boolean/Query searching in Users (
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 07/May/20 ] |
|
Bohdan Suprun and Michal Kuklis could you please estimate this feature? Thanks much! |
| Comment by Bohdan Suprun (Inactive) [ 08/May/20 ] |
|
Hi Cate Boerema, The 1-2 should not require a lot of backend work, just to make sure that all indexes are in place. The 3rd one, is it a new field to add? I don't see any department field on user record. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 11/May/20 ] |
|
Good catch, Bohdan Suprun. patty.wanninger, can you please move the "ability to search on departments" into the Department feature (which would then need to be re-estimated to include this additional work) or create a separate feature for filtering by departments? I'll X it out of this feature for now so this one can be estimated. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 13/May/20 ] |
|
Michal Kuklis can you please add a frontend estimate for this? |
| Comment by Michal Kuklis [ 13/May/20 ] |
|
Sorry Cate Boerema I missed this. It should be now done. I think if we take a similar approach to what has been done in ui-inventory then this should be a pretty quick change on the UI. |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 17/Jun/20 ] |
|
Cornell comment from Round IV Outliers spreadsheet: This outlier is a showstopper for Cornell |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 19/Jun/20 ] |
|
patty.wanninger can you say more about what users are expecting with "explicit truncation"? They want to have to search for "John*" in order to find "Johnson"? |
| Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 22/Jun/20 ] |
|
Does the scope of this also include searching custom fields, or is there another jira for that? patty.wanninger |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 24/Jul/20 ] |
|
Hi Erin Nettifee patty.wanninger - sorry for being late to the party re. this question which Erin raised above: re. ability to search custom fields. Khalilah Gambrell - when you and your team defined the Custom fields concept -
I can see how this would also be very relevant for when we plan to do the implementation of Custom fields in Inventory -
CC: lew235 |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 24/Jul/20 ] |
|
Erin Nettifee, patty.wanninger, lew235, and Charlotte Whitt, custom fields searching is already supported by the backend. To be honest, I have not given a lot of thought on the custom field searching/filtering other than the following:
|
| Comment by patty.wanninger [ 17/Sep/20 ] |
|
User Management SIG agreed that the current searching in users covers required use cases. The RA SIG also reviewed and agreed. So we are not pursuing the development of this feature at this time. 9/16/2020 |
| Comment by Björn Muschall [ 05/Oct/20 ] |
|
Per discussion with A.-M.: If there's a general keyword search box in Users (in addition to fielded searches), then it would be good to be clear about which fields the general search box covers, similar to Inventory keyword search. UM SIG now agreed that Leipzig dev-team will be developing this feature. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Oct/20 ] |
|
Changed dev team from Core Functional to Leipzig |
| Comment by Annika Schröer [ 06/Oct/20 ] |
|
Moved to Leipzig for development, as discussed with patty.wanninger. |
| Comment by Annika Schröer [ 17/Oct/20 ] |
|
Reset all rankings on 2020-10-17, as the feature was split. |