Single MARC Record Integration with OCLC
(UXPROD-211)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | TBD | Parent: | Single MARC Record Integration with OCLC |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Mike Gorrell | Assignee: | Ryan Taylor |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | loading | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Release: | Not Scheduled | ||||||||
| Epic Link: | Single MARC Record Integration with OCLC | ||||||||
| Development Team: | Folijet | ||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
--------------------------------------------------- Old text. To be reviewed and updated: • In this case, we recently received the second volume of a two-part set. The record in our local system only has the description from the first volume and is not up to date with the new ISBNs and some other fields. We already have our holdings on the correct OCLC record and I don't want to create an item or a holdings record; I just want to update our local bib record with a newer version from OCLC. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 05/Dec/23 ] |
|
Hi Ann-Marie Breaux- I removed Mjolnier as development team, and assigned this feature to the FOLJIET dev team |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 05/Dec/23 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt That's fine - no worries. We'll just put it in the Folijet backlog for now. Thank you! |