Fees/Fines
(UXPROD-792)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | Fees/Fines |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Fees/Fines |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Emma Boettcher | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | PMP, Unassigned-from-Holly, feesfines, loans, resourceaccess | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Workaround: | None. Not ranked by every institution, but I would anticipate that this would be not needed for some and go live for others, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Fees/Fines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Holly Mistlebauer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Low | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | XL < 15 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Holly Mistlebauer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Mainz (Full TBD): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Update on September 3, 2020 Holly presented this topic to the RA SIG on September 3, 2020. See her slide deck at https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gCwAlZ-UTUHj_65EshjHRKcIu0oFLIDPijqvJzS1nXw/edit?usp=sharing (with decisions documented in blue text). We need to "scrub" fee/fine data in two ways:
When a loan has incurred a fine, some institutions may want to remove item and loan information from the fine, in order to be compliant with legal requirements and protect the patron's privacy. From previous feature:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 09/Jul/19 ] |
|
Duke can wait for this up to a year. |
| Comment by David Bottorff [ 09/Jul/19 ] |
|
Chicago can wait for this up to a year. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 29/Jul/19 ] |
|
Hi Emma Boettcher can you please give this a PO rank? |
| Comment by Marie Widigson [ 18/Feb/21 ] |
|
Although Chalmers is not using fees/fines we're changing our handling of overdue books now and will be using the status Aged to lost, and a fake fee. As anonymizing all closed loans is a legal demand (GDPR) we change our ranking to R2. |