Item states (status)
(UXPROD-1321)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Item states (status) |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Emma Boettcher | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | round_iv, swag | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Item states (status) | ||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | XL < 15 days | ||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | ||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Low | ||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | XXL < 30 days | ||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | ||||||||||||
| Estimation Notes and Assumptions: | CB: Per discussion with Jakub and cap planning team, a few of us non-developers are going to estimate the remaining unestimated features so as not to disrupt development. I am giving this 15/30 (FE/BE) based on the estimates for UXPROD-1590. I'll tag this feature as "SWAG" so we know to come back to this when we have more info. | ||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 2 | ||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 68 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R3 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Current situation or problem: Item status bulk edits can't be a free-for-all; certain restrictions should exist:
In scope
Out of scope
Use case(s) Proposed solution/stories Links to additional info Questions |
| Comments |
| Comment by lew235 [ 19/Aug/20 ] |
|
Should this feature be linked to the bulk edit epic? |
| Comment by Emma Boettcher [ 24/Aug/20 ] |
|
lew235 Maybe, but I've kept it here because there's not a product owner assigned to the bulk edit epic right now. |
| Comment by lew235 [ 25/Aug/20 ] |
|
|
| Comment by Marie Widigson [ 02/Dec/20 ] |
|
We would love a lot of bulk editing, but editing item status is not prioritized for us. Changing the ranking from R2 to R4 and instead rank
|
| Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 13/Dec/22 ] |
|
This was done in
|