eHoldings App (UXPROD-830)

[UXPROD-1527] Orders App: Add a resource in KB to a PO/POL Created: 07/Feb/19  Updated: 08/Nov/21

Status: Open
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: eHoldings App

Type: New Feature Priority: P4
Reporter: Khalilah Gambrell Assignee: Dennis Bridges
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: acquisitions, chalmers, chalmers_debut_followup, crossrmapps, eholdings, orders, resourcemanagement, round_iv
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Issue links:
Continues
continues UXPROD-184 Find item in KB/codex and add detials... Draft
Relates
relates to UIEH-673 Spike: Search Orders and attach to Pr... Closed
Epic Link: eHoldings App
Development Team: Thunderjet
Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): 5
PO Rank: 59.7
PO Ranking Note: DB: Now assigned to me so lowering the rank to line up with my other rankings.
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R4
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R2
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R2
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R4
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R3
Rank: 5Colleges (ERM Jun 2020): R3
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R5
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): R2
Rank: hbz (TBD): R4
Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): R1
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): R2
Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): R2
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R4
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R2

 Description   

Via the Orders app, allow a user to search a KB to add a resource to a PO/POL. This feature will mirror the integration between Inventory and Order apps. The user adds a resource from the KB and metadata will populate the POL's item details section. This feature also sets the foundation for the following features

  • Create Instance/Item/Container in Inventory App
  • Automatic resource activation in KB based on Order status


 Comments   
Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 08/Feb/19 ]

Khalilah Gambrell, Can you help determine the ranking for this? Is this required for Chalmers to have a basic ERM workflow in place?

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 08/Feb/19 ]

Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) - it is not required for basic ERM workflow.

Comment by Marie Widigson [ 16/Sep/19 ]

Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) Can you please change the ranking from Not needed to Can wait up to a year. We may want to use orders in eHoldings later and Automatic resource activation in KB based on Order status would be nice.

Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 16/Sep/19 ]

Marie Widigson done!

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 13/Nov/20 ]

Dennis Bridges, we now have a plug-in that can be used to support this requirement. Please see priority of this feature and whether or not this should be assigned to Thunderjet team.

Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 13/Nov/20 ]

Thanks Khalilah Gambrell I think it does make sense that Thunderjet would implement this feature. It seems to be implied in the description that you may want the POL to also link to an Instance, even though it already links to a record in the KB?

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 13/Nov/20 ]

Dennis Bridges, I should revise the description as this was written a long time ago when the expectation was an integration with Inventory. It might be enough that this feature supports population of package/resource metadata.

Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 13/Nov/20 ]

Sounds good, I will leave it with you until you've had a chance to review it and then maybe you can just assign it to me to follow up.

Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 09/Feb/21 ]

Dennis Bridges - This feature needs to be estimated ASAP so it is included in the Juniper Capacity Plan, which we are creating on Thursday morning. Thanks...
cc: Khalilah Gambrell

Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 09/Feb/21 ]

Holly Mistlebauer We just assigned this to me today and I don't see there being an expectation to deliver this in Juniper, based on the calculated rank. That is why I've set the PO ranking lower. There should be 25 Thunderjet features with a higher PO ranking than this. If somehow there is capacity to get this far down the list I will prioritize getting an estimate for this. DO you have different information regarding the priority of this feature? If so just let me know and I will try to get an estimate together.

Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 09/Feb/21 ]

Dennis Bridges: Agreed. It was higher up before it was reassigned to you. Thanks...

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:16:17 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.