Requests
(UXPROD-790)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Requests |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P5 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | requests, round_iv | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | Requests | ||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 5 | ||||||||
| PO Rank: | 22 | ||||||||
| PO Ranking Note: | 2020-10-04 - CB: Making my PO rank same as the calculated total rank for now.
2019-07-12: Keeping PO rank same as calculated rank (with potential minor adjustments to avoid having two features with same rank) |
||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R4 | ||||||||
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 | ||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R4 | ||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R5 | ||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R5 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Automated storage and retrieval systems like the one at University of Chicago come with a unique set of needs. When a request comes in for an item stored in the ASR, it must be flagged in such a way that the ASR system can detect the presence of a new request so it can be retrieved by robotic arm. For this purpose, we have designed a new request type called "ASR Request". Current thinking on design:
FAQs:
Final note: These types of systems are very expensive and very high-visibility in their institutions. It is extremely important that they work well and they work fast. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 06/Feb/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema could you elaborate on the concept of ASRs? |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 06/Feb/19 ] |
Not yet, Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se). It just came up in the RA SIG as a must-have for Chicago, but I don't have the details. |
| Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 06/Feb/19 ] |
|
Ok, l'll be watching this |
| Comment by Anya [ 06/Feb/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema ] FC is not sure how to rate this or if it needs to be rated. |
| Comment by Tod Olson [ 12/Apr/19 ] |
|
To elaborate at ASRs a little bit: An ASR is a high-density storage system with robotic retrieval. These are more common in commercial inventory systems, like for Ford or Walmart, but are finding use in libraries with large collections. University of Nevada Las Vegas was an early adopter, U. Chicago, North Carolina State University to name a few. The U. Chicago setting is typical. The books are loaded into bins in the ASR system, the ASR's database tracks which bin a book is in, and even which section of a bin. When a library patron requests a book that is in the ASR, the request is communicated to the ASR via API, a robot finds and retrieves the bin, and a human operator removes the book from the bin and makes it available to the patron. When the book is returned, the ASR the bin and the process is reversed. There's a writeup and video on the Mansueto Library's Automated Storage and Retrieval Here is some similar information on NC State University Libraries' Hunt Library bookBot |
| Comment by Stephanie Buck [ 29/Sep/20 ] |
|
David Bottorff and Cheryl Malmborg, given the work Stacy has done so far and that I'm continuing on remote storage integration, do we still need this feature? For reference,
|
| Comment by Brooks Travis [ 05/Feb/21 ] |
|
Stephanie Buck Did you ever get a response on whether we still need this feature given the work that's being done for the remote storage integrations? |
| Comment by Stephanie Buck [ 05/Feb/21 ] |
|
Brooks Travis, I did not. David Bottorff and Cheryl Malmborg, does UXPROD2696 cover the needs of this feature? |
| Comment by David Bottorff [ 05/Feb/21 ] |
|
I believe that's the case, but I would like Tod Olson to confirm, as he's got a more detailed understanding of where we are with our edge module development. |
| Comment by Tod Olson [ 05/Feb/21 ] |
|
My view is that
|
| Comment by David Bottorff [ 05/Feb/21 ] |
|
That sounds right to me as well |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 07/Mar/22 ] |
|
This feature is marked DRAFT until Brooks Travis has a chance to review it for validity. |