Requests
(UXPROD-790)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Q1 2019 | Parent: | Requests |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | v+v_candidate | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Medium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Marc Johnson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimation Notes and Assumptions: | Includes adding the period interval and duration properties to a service point
Includes using period during check in Assumes that repeated check in will reset the expiration to current date and time plus period (and overwrite any manual changes) CB: I needed a frontend estimate for planning so I put 5 days on this feature. @michal, please adjust as needed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Prokopovych | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Create a Hold shelf expiry setting in the service point form. When items become awaiting pickup for a request at a service point, FOLIO will look to this setting and populate the Hold Shelf expiration period in the request form (this field already exists, it's just being populated with some random date). The hold shelf expiration period can be manually changed after being set according to the SP defaults (edit capability is already in place). Hold shelf expiration date is already a token for the print slips. We need to make sure this date is populated in the print slips, as well. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 29/Nov/18 ] |
|
Marc Johnson and Michal Kuklis, can you please estimate this feature? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema Given that it is possible to repeatedly check an item in at a service point, what is the expected effect on the hold shelf expiry date? Should it be reset to the current date and time plus the configured period, or not be changed? If it should be changed, then that might overwrite any manual changes that a user has made. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Hi Marc Johnson. This is actually described in UICHKN-49 and UICHKN-50. The first time an item whose status is changing to Awaiting pickup is checked in, the hold shelf expiration date is set. Subsequent check ins that don't change the status from Awaiting pickup do not change the hold shelf expiration date. The one weird use case is:
I think we can generalize logic needed for the the above use case with this statement: Any time an item is checked in and the status is changing to In Transit, the hold shelf expiration date is cleared or left blank. Make sense? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema Thanks. Does that mean that this feature is dependent upon the feature
|
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema I took a look at the scenarios in those issues. Scenario 3 of
|
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Well, I guess it is now. I had originally put a temp story into
All that is to say, I think you are right. This now blocks some of
Do you have a preference? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 04/Dec/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema I think I might be confused.
If we want to keep
Once that is done, I think we can choose which of these is higher priority to start first. To me, this would make
Otherwise, I think the two features are effectively intertwined (and might as well subsume all of this into
|
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Dec/18 ] |
|
Michal Kuklis, can you please put in a frontend estimate for this? The 5 currently showing is just my best guess (I needed an estimate for planning). Thanks |
| Comment by Michal Kuklis [ 05/Dec/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema just a quick question about this. Is the
|
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Dec/18 ] |
|
Actually, Michal Kuklis, Marc Johnson suggested this feature should also cover populating the hold shelf expiration date on the request when it goes into awaiting pickup. Given that, I have moved the story that covers that functionality (
|
| Comment by Michal Kuklis [ 06/Dec/18 ] |
|
Sounds good Cate Boerema. I think Medium for front end is reasonable here. |