Staff Slips
(UXPROD-19)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Q4 2019 | Parent: | Staff Slips |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Darcy Branchini |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | cap-mvp, po-mvp, printslips, q4-2019-at-risk, requests | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Workaround: | Darcy
- UXPROD-923 Requests in-app report: Requests Pick List, but that feature also tags this feature as a possible work-around. I'm ranking it higher assuming this one will be implemented and UXPROD-923 will not. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Staff Slips | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Kostyantyn Khodarev | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Kostyantyn Khodarev | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Purpose/Problem:
Implementation Thoughts:
Further use cases: (from Uschi Klute in comments below) |
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Nov/18 ] |
|
Schwill, Carsten, can you please take a look at this feature and add any additions/changes? |
| Comment by Schwill, Carsten [ 08/Nov/18 ] |
|
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 15/May/19 ] |
|
Kostyantyn Khodarev could you please provide the t-shirt size estimates for this feature? I feel like Vega would be best positioned to estimate this since it's a kind of staff slip (like hold and transit). These estimates are intended to be rough - please don't spend too much time thinking about it. That said, if you have questions, please let me know. + Darcy Branchini because this one actually falls between our areas. Not sure if this should be considered part of Requests or Staff slips... Anyway, we need it estimated regardless |
| Comment by Darcy Branchini [ 16/May/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema - My understanding is that from a user perspective, this is closely related to
|
| Comment by Uschi Klute [ 11/Jun/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema, Darcy Branchini - It is absolutely necessary that individual slips are created for page requests. |
| Comment by Anya [ 11/Jun/19 ] |
|
Hi Cate Boerema the capacity plan has this as a planned release as q2 2020 and this is q4 2019 - which one is correct? |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 12/Jun/19 ] |
|
Hi Anya target releases beyond Q2 should be ignored. We haven't completed planning for Q3 and beyond. The dates you see are just POs' best guesses and many of them are very stale |
| Comment by Darcy Branchini [ 12/Jun/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema, I was planning to handle this as the PO for "staff or print slips," but are you planning to instead? |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 13/Jun/19 ] |
|
Hi Darcy Branchini this one could go either way as it's definitely a staff slip and definitely request-related. As I mentioned earlier, now that the basic staff slip feature is in place, I feel that other POs should be able to extend on it, as long as they keep you in the loop. That said, I'm time-starved and more than happy to let you take this one. |
| Comment by Darcy Branchini [ 13/Jun/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema, since I was already planning to, I'll continue with that plan. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 28/Jun/19 ] |
|
Tentatively reassigning to Vega, since that's the team Darcy works with most and they "own" staff slips |
| Comment by Darcy Branchini [ 02/Jul/19 ] |
|
This feature was reviewed at the RA SIG meeting on 7/1/2019 and consensus was that this was still a go-live feature. However, many institutions felt the workaround proposed above (using the report instead of individual slips) might be an acceptable work-around temporarily. |