[UXPROD-128] Spec and implement storage of batch loaded MARC records stored in blob - in Inventory Created: 18/Jan/18 Updated: 16/Sep/20 Resolved: 30/Jul/18 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Q3 2018 |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Charlotte Whitt |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | inventory, metadatamanagement | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | 15 minutes | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis Estimate: | Small < 3 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis Estimator: | Charlotte Whitt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Medium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Niels Erik Nielsen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Prokopovych | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Spec and implement storage of batch loaded MARC records stored in blob - in Inventory. Define linking to matching Inventory record, and possible few search criteria. Sources: |
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 04/Apr/18 ] |
|
Charlotte Whitt, should we break this feature into two? One for MARC source record storage (assigned to you) and another for searching by all MARC fields (assigned to Tiziana)? |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 04/Apr/18 ] |
|
Hi Cate Boerema, yes, that would make sense. I can do the split - see new feature:
|
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 04/Apr/18 ] |
|
Can we change the title of this story to something narrower, then, like "Store MARC records in blob - in Inventory"? The search part would fall into Tiziana's story, I assume. Because Inventory has its own search already. Make sense? |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 05/Apr/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema - done |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 05/Jun/18 ] |
|
Charlotte Whitt do you think it makes sense for this to continue to live within Inventory assigned to you since you already started on it? Or should we hand this off to Ann-Marie? |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 05/Jun/18 ] |
|
This one is about the Generic bib storage - and not that much about the MARC batch loader (witch is the focus Ann-Marie has). See: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kZQVGRZ3wqNnFn672ZyIWqDuNu4KwSJNtDXjCeHloNU/edit |
| Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 19/Jun/18 ] |
|
Is the title a bit misleading or will the records actually be stored in inventory app? I was under the impression that it should be stored outside of Inventory? |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 19/Jun/18 ] |
|
True, I think this feature was written before it was decided that records would be stored in mod-source-storage per the diagram here: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1KEhJRJeEEeH1_hVZqE01oXGd3IdtU_L1pH8g0DTaXQk/edit I think we can remove the "in Inventory" part of the summary. Charlotte Whitt, I'll go ahead and do it since you are on vacation. |
| Comment by Theodor Tolstoy (One-Group.se) [ 19/Jun/18 ] |
|
Thank you Cate Boerema |
| Comment by patty.wanninger [ 21/Jun/18 ] |
|
On behalf of UA, we want to know are these records in a "BLOB" ? or somekind of FOLIO specific data format? |
| Comment by Wayne Schneider [ 21/Jun/18 ] |
|
Please note that the link shared above by Charlotte and Cate is a link to an old copy of the batch load diagram. The diagram as shared with metadata management is here: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1IN2t0T838HtHytNctdugQN0nL8_KSJ-PzysQxSyZ1Hc/edit The old document is about to go away |
| Comment by Wayne Schneider [ 21/Jun/18 ] |
|
patty.wanninger – the expectation is that the data will be stored in a way that it can be round-tripped – whatever the format (MARC-in-JSON seems a likely candidate, but we could also just store a binary blob, I suppose), you should be able to get out what you put in. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 25/Jun/18 ] |
|
Niels Erik Nielsen Wayne Schneider - do we have any test blob records which we can link to from instance records in Inventory? |