[UIU-546] Indicate Service Point for Users (FOLIO Operators) in User Record Created: 19/Jun/18 Updated: 03/Jul/19 Resolved: 16/Aug/18 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | ui-users |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | 2.13.0 |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | md331 (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | demo43, sprint42, sprint43, sprint44 | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Prokopovych | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Purpose: When work is being done in FOLIO, it is necessary to know what "service point" (functional location e.g. circ desk) the work is being done at. In order to indicate the service point for a session, the RA SIG has decided that users will have 0 to many service points associated with them (where they are allowed to work) and they will then select from among those to indicate the SP to be used for their session. The purpose of this story is to outline how service points can be associated with users. User story: Scenarios:
CB: Should we combine this story with
Out of scope:
Mockups: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1b-QSV-75p-xiLGNO2qgrcVbB0eCz6zuV |
| Comments |
| Comment by md331 (Inactive) [ 11/Jul/18 ] |
|
Cate Boerema, are there any plans to have the Add Service Point dialog used in locations other than Users? I.e., would we want to assign Service Points to something other than a user? I can't think of anything at the moment and the related Discussion didn't seem to suggest anything, but I just want to double check. For now, I think the only difference for me would be where I put the component (ui-users vs stripes-smart-components) and we could always move it later. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 12/Jul/18 ] |
|
md331 are you talking about this modal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ol7pxMGvEWMlspFNwq15K_Fab2bsav5O/view?usp=sharing ? There are no plans to need that exact modal anywhere else. There are plans to associate service points with the session, of course, but there you only select one from the list of SPs associated with your user record: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10tLwQmuMurA08ZL1Ur05FZbPm3EFl-Lo/view?usp=sharing Let me know if that didn't answer your question. |
| Comment by Kurt Nordstrom [ 12/Jul/18 ] |
|
Per discussion during our Thursday roundup, I believe we have agreed on the following points:
Service points are currently accessible at /service-points. In order to stay consistent, I would propose a /service-points-users endpoint, where we provide CRUD on a resource that would look like the following:
{
"id" : "",
"userId" : "",
"servicePointIds" : [ ],
"defaultServicePointId" : ""
}
|
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 06/Aug/18 ] |
|
John Malconian ths item is waiting for a succesfull snapshot-stable build |
| Comment by md331 (Inactive) [ 15/Aug/18 ] |
|
Hey Anya, I've merged a PR to add that little "X results found" text. I didn't add it at first since when we get around to adding the search and filter capabilities, we'll get that little message for free with the implementation. Question though, the bulk selection checkbox is there and working for me on snapshot-stable. Can you let me know if you're still having issues with it and how it differs from your expectation or the story? Cheers! |
| Comment by Anya [ 15/Aug/18 ] |
|
Mark, we did not see the bulk selection yesterday in snapshot - but we will be testing again tomorrow. Could you or the PO mark the X results found as out of scope for this ticket then put it back into in review? Thank you very much for these comments! |
| Comment by md331 (Inactive) [ 15/Aug/18 ] |
|
Hmm, it's weird that the checkbox wasn't visible yesterday since that was part of the PR that added the whole functionality. It should be directly to the left of the "Name" column header, so hopefully it'll be visible tomorrow. In any case, I moved this back to In Review. |