[UIQM-512] MARC Bib Templates/Permission Created: 27/Apr/23 Updated: 11/Oct/23 |
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | ui-quick-marc |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Marcin Mystkowski | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | cataloging, epam-spitfire, front-end, marc-bib | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||
| Development Team: | Spitfire | ||||||||
| RCA Group: | TBD | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Permission for managing BIB rec templates. Quite similar to how its organized in Orders:
Permissions are not mutually exclusive. User may have more than one permission so they are complementary. User with either of those permission has access to Apps / Settings / MARC / Templates:
NOTE! We are not adding a separete permission for ability to create a New MARC bib record from a template. User with any of the following permissions can use templates:
To sum up - during cataloging process every cataloger can use all templates. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Marcin Mystkowski [ 24/May/23 ] |
|
There is another way to organize permission for creating BIB rec templates . Quite similar to how its organized in Orders:
Permissions are not mutually exclusive. User may have more than one persmission so they are complementary. There is no Global editor (uber user) permission. There is no such a idea as template owner During cataloging process every cataloger can see and use all templates if he has persmission for cataoging and for usage for this templates Only user with permission no.4 can delete (all) templates Only user with permission no.3 can duplicate templates Pros: flexibility, transparency, clear and consistens rules with other Folio apps, we do not need build new logic Cons: I am not sure but I feel that this kind of permission will couse much more templates, wich in fact is much more messy - but it is only a (unjustified) feeling ? Others cons ?
|
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 25/May/23 ] |
|
| Comment by Marcin Mystkowski [ 25/May/23 ] |
|
I did several tests with templates for orders, and with permissions for templates for orders So proposal is excatly the same as in orders. I realized that if user have got #3 and #4 then have got full permission:
NOTE! We are not adding a separete permission for ability to create a New MARC bib record from a template. User with any of the following permissions can use templates:
|
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 25/May/23 ] |
|
| Comment by Jacek Gajkiewicz [ 28/Jun/23 ] |
|
Hi Khalilah Gambrell , Marcin Mystkowski I asked Dennis Bridges why Create and Delete are not put together in orders template permissions. Here is the answer:
The reasons he gave are quite convincing to me, especially the last one. |