[UIIN-2321] In Inventory search, Item, for a Former Identifier, results display instance not item totals Created: 06/Jan/23 Updated: 08/Feb/23 |
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | ui-inventory |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Kay Granskog | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||
| Development Team: | Prokopovych | ||||||||
| Affected Institution: |
MI State University/Library of Michigan
|
||||||||
| RCA Group: | TBD | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Overview:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 09/Jan/23 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt There was no dev team on this bug. I added Prokopovych, since it's related to Inventory searching. I realize it may not be a bug exactly, but please review and decide how you would like to handle. Thank you! |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 07/Feb/23 ] |
|
Hi Kay Granskog - the current way Search in Inventory works is, that we display the instances in the result list, and then holdings, and item are associated, so the logic is: instance > holdings > item. You are absolutely right that the count is instances, and not items. So what you report is not a bug. That said, then we very much want to change the current behavior, and this has been a year long requirement, and ask from the community. New work has been defined, and what you want to see, would be implemented when we eventually get to have a result list, and searches as described in
I'll move this ticket to be a UIIN issue, change it to be a 'story' and then associated it with
CC: Kristin Martin Felix Hemme Raegan Wiechert - I here add you in CC, with the hope that you maybe can push for getting this work on the Product Council's road map plan and prioritization of work. |
| Comment by Kay Granskog [ 07/Feb/23 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt - I understand the difference in why it isn't a bug. If there is anything I can do to encourage this story to be a priority, let me know. Thank you for setting it on a better path. We have tried to overcome this deficiency with a workaround one of my colleagues created using the API but it currently takes over a minute to produce results. I have a ticket in about that via EBSCOConnect. |