[UIIN-1215] Holdings. Holdings statements notes. Public and Staff only. Created: 23/Jul/20 Updated: 14/Oct/20 Resolved: 24/Aug/20 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | ui-inventory |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | 5.0.0 |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Charlotte Whitt | Assignee: | Sergiy Sergiyenko |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | back-end, demo95, migration-load, migrations, round_iv | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Core: F - Sprint 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Prokopovych | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Overview: When migrating data there is a need for University Chicago, Cornell, Duke and other libraries to have the possibility to mark holdings statement notes either as public notes or staff (non public) notes. This story is about relabeling an existing data element, and adding a new data element (detailed view and edit view) Use case: Stories:
Notes:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 24/Aug/20 ] |
|
Manual test in FOLIO Snapshot https://folio-snapshot.dev.folio.org/, version @folio/inventory 5.0.1000992, using Chrome. All looks great, thank you so much Sergiy Sergiyenko Ann-Marie Breaux, and Magda Zacharska - all three holdings statements notes have now been enhanced with the possibility to split the notes in public and staff only in Inventory. The work is not ready to be followed by updates in the Data Import MARC mapping and the Data Export MARC mapping. Thanks. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 24/Aug/20 ] |
|
Sergiy Sergiyenko Ryan Laddusaw The pull request for
How is this working in folio-snapshot? Is it because the holdings statements objects defined in the JSON schema do not disallow additional properties and so the client is allowed to provide the new property even though it is yet to be defined? cc: Zak Burke |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 24/Aug/20 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt In your last sentence, you say the work is not ready to be followed by updates... did you mean the work is now ready? I'm guessing yes, but just wanted to doublecheck! |
| Comment by Magda Zacharska [ 24/Aug/20 ] |
|
Ann-Marie Breaux - the backend work that is needed for data-export and data-import is not merged yet . That work is covered by
|