SIP2: Protocol for self-checkout
(UXPROD-1001)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | sip2 |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | 3.0.0 | Parent: | SIP2: Protocol for self-checkout |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Hkaplanian | Assignee: | Gurleen Kaur1 |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | back-end, q1-2019-spillover | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Volaris Sprint 157, Volaris Sprint 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Volaris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Release: | Orchid (R1 2023) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | SIP2: Protocol for self-checkout | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
FOLIO must send this message in response to the Item Information message. Fields not supported:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Magda Zacharska [ 18/Mar/19 ] |
|
18<circulation status><hold queue length><security marker><fee type><transaction date><due date><recall date><hold pickup date><item identifier><title identifier><owner><currency type><fee amount><media type><permanent location><current location><item properties><screen message><print line> |
| Comment by Magda Zacharska [ 09/Feb/22 ] |
|
Additional use case provided by Bibliotheca: In this case with the customer we will be demoing for, there is a specific use case.
Customer does their checkout. Items are partially processed (ie RFID does not turn off the security bit).
When the customer exits the gates alarm, indicating an item has not been checked out. Library staff ask patron to come back empty out their entire bag of books and reprocess all items at a staff desk.
With our gates + staffConnect Gate software, the ILS has a connection to the staffConnect gate software. The RFID gates alarm, and then when this occurs, the staffConnect software sends a request to the ILS to do an item information lookup (what is the item matching this barcode). The ILS responds and our software will then display the title of the item that was not processed correctly and the library staff can ask the patron to give them the book title “XYZ” based on what our software is reporting.
Similarly, in another use case, if we want to look up a patron account (a function we can do on our selfChecks), there is a request that can be made to provide patrons with item specific information (title, due dates etc). |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 08/Nov/22 ] |
|
This capability is currently in a community branch and may be merged into the main. See latest comments in
|
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 13/Dec/22 ] |
|
I think this and
|
| Comment by Gurleen Kaur1 [ 23/Jan/23 ] |
|
Hi Tim Auger , By going through
Which command are we discussing about because as per the 3M SIP2 protocol doc there are 2 commands as shown -
FYI - Both these commands as of today are not implemented in edge-sip2. Questions -
|
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 23/Jan/23 ] |
|
Question 1 As noted this morning, we have code from community contributor, Gordon Goldner, that can be used as reference. He has implemented the 18 command and may be of use for our implementation. Question 2 Question 3 |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 28/Jan/23 ] |
|
Gurleen Kaur1 I have inquired with FETech (selfcheck vendor) about what they would expect in the response. I'm waiting but the good news is that they are located in Australia so they are hours ahead of both of us. |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 30/Jan/23 ] |
|
Gurleen Kaur1 I confirmed with FEtech that was they need does not include the:
The only question I have is whether or not we are able to get the fines data. |
| Comment by Gurleen Kaur1 [ 31/Jan/23 ] |
|
Thanks Tim Auger , For your question - "The only question I have is whether or not we are able to get the fines data. " - By fine data do you mean fees? Then, no we are not determining it as fee type is also a mandate filed it will be defaulted to 01 (other/unknown). |
| Comment by Gurleen Kaur1 [ 01/Feb/23 ] |
|
Hi Tim Auger , The code is implemented and the response of item information command would be as highlighted in yellow (shown below) –
In case the item barcode didnt fetch an item record then it will display a message item does not exists as highlighted below in yellow – |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 01/Feb/23 ] |
|
Gurleen Kaur1 Excellent. Sorry about the confusion regarding the security marker. Blank or null are correct and 01 (NONE) is not correct. Fines are the same as fees. And defaulting to 01 is right. thanks.
|
| Comment by Gurleen Kaur1 [ 02/Feb/23 ] |
|
Hi Tim Auger , |