Batch Importer (Bib/Acq)
(UXPROD-47)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | mod-source-record-storage |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | 3.2.0 | Parent: | Batch Importer (Bib/Acq) |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Oleksii Kuzminov | Assignee: | William Welling |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | data-import, epam-folijet, performance | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Sprint: | EPAM BatchLoader Sprint 40 | ||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Folijet | ||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Batch Importer (Bib/Acq) | ||||||||||||
| Description |
Steps
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Oleksii Kuzminov [ 29/Apr/20 ] |
|
William Welling I think we missed metadata fields in tables |
| Comment by William Welling [ 29/Apr/20 ] |
|
Oleksii Kuzminov I can add fields. What is the desired table, types, and constraints for the metadata fields? |
| Comment by Oleksii Kuzminov [ 29/Apr/20 ] |
|
William Welling https://github.com/folio-org/raml/blob/9d7fe883b4e08a262ee3cffc69c33f8b7b63710b/schemas/metadata.schema |
| Comment by William Welling [ 29/Apr/20 ] |
|
Oleksii Kuzminov Are these the same as fields on new records_lb table? https://github.com/folio-org/mod-source-record-storage/blob/master/mod-source-record-storage-server/src/main/resources/liquibase/tenant/scripts/v-0.0.1/2020-04-27--13-00-create-records-table.xml#L52 As described in the ER diagram |
| Comment by Oleksii Kuzminov [ 29/Apr/20 ] |
|
William Welling yes, sorry, I did not notice |
| Comment by Kateryna Senchenko [ 04/May/20 ] |
|
Hi William Welling, can we close this ticket? |
| Comment by Kateryna Senchenko [ 04/May/20 ] |
|
William Welling, closing this ticket. In case there're any issues, a separate ticket will be raised. Thanks |