quickMARC: MARC Validation
(UXPROD-3985)
|
|
| Status: | Blocked |
| Project: | mod-quick-marc |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | quickMARC: MARC Validation |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Khalilah Gambrell | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | back-end, epam-spitfire, marc-validation | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Spitfire | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | quickMARC: MARC Validation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Requirements
Scenarios for testing 1. Some bib rec. have got field: 100, 110, 111, 130 Librarian can not save record with more than one field from group: 1xx. So:
2. Record can be saved with only one 1XX: 100 (one) or 110 (one) or 111 (one) or 130 (one) or none Non-repeatable rule is for whole group not for each fields separately - https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd1xx.html 3. Import a record with multiple 1XXs IF a user creates or updates a bib record with multiple 1XXs via data import IF a user creates or updates a bib record with multiple 1XXs via data import IF a user creates or updates a bib record with multiple 1XXs via data import |
| Comments |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 29/Dec/23 ] |
|
Marcin Mystkowski - when you have a moment, can you review this requirement and let me know if this requirement meets your expectations? |
| Comment by Christine Schultz-Richert [ 04/Jan/24 ] |
|
Refinement 1/4/23: Blocked until overall solution for MARC validation is defined. |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 05/Jan/24 ] |
|
Pavlo Smahin and Valery_Pilko, I removed the checking if the 1XX is valid requirement. Will handle in a separate story. |