[MODINVSTOR-633] Format reference values - rdacarrier types - missing value for audio belt (sb) Created: 06/Nov/20 Updated: 10/Jun/21 Resolved: 06/Jun/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | mod-inventory-storage |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | 21.0.0 |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Charlotte Whitt | Assignee: | Alen |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | support | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Sprint: | Prokopovych - Sprint 114, Prokopovych - Sprint 115, Prokopovych - Sprint 111, Prokopovych - Sprint 113 |
| Story Points: | 3 |
| Development Team: | Prokopovych |
| Affected Institution: |
5 Colleges
|
| Tester Assignee: | Charlotte Whitt |
| Description |
Back-end PerspectiveGiven an new system Given an existing system using an older version of mod-inventory-storage Scope
UI PerspectiveOverview: Corrections of current list of format reference values: Steps to reproduce:
Expected result: Actual result: Interested parties: Jennifer Eustis Aaron NeslinAnn Kardos |
| Comments |
| Comment by Anya [ 06/Nov/20 ] |
| Comment by Ann Kardos [ 09/Nov/20 ] |
|
5C FOLIO Sandbox has incorrect coding for Settings – Inventory – Formats. In the "audio" section, audio – audio cartridge is incorrectly coded as sd. Correct code is sg. I'm attaching screenshots from 5C sandbox and from FOLIO Honeysuckle bugfest. Also, both 5C sandbox and Honeysuckle bugfest environment Formats are not up-to-date. There is a recent audio carrier for audio – audio belt, with code sb. I was able to add it to the 5C sandbox (you can see in the attachment) |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 09/Nov/20 ] |
|
Hi Ann Kardos - this looks more as a bug, and not a feature. Let me check what's wrong here. CC: Anya Laura Daniels |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 18/Nov/20 ] |
|
Hi Ann Kardos - just a quick question: when I'm looking in Bugfest Honeysuckle env. (and in FOLIO Snapshot) then I see But in 5C's enviroment it's audio – audio cartridge (sb)? |
| Comment by Ann Kardos [ 18/Nov/20 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte WhittCharlotte! Yes, you can see in this screenshot: audio--audio cartridge is the second element and it is coded sd. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 18/Nov/20 ] |
|
Hi Ann Kardos - that must be a typo in your local environment at 5C, while it's not in FOLIO Snapshot, nor in Bugfest-Honeysuckle. I guess the good thing is, when you get upgraded to the Honeysuckle release, then you'll get the updated reference data. I checked Simmons environment in Goldenrod, and here the code is also sg as in FOLIO Snapshot and Bugfest Honeysuckle: |
| Comment by Anya [ 23/Nov/20 ] |
|
Mark Veksler Are we pulling this Reference data from GIt? why would this not be the same as bugfest |
| Comment by Zak Burke [ 23/Nov/20 ] |
|
I don't think this is a UIIN story; maybe it should be moved to mod-inventory-storage? Regardless, a few notes:
|
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 23/Nov/20 ] |
|
Felix Hemme - will you help me and verify in the RDA Tool kit, what's the current implementation plan for the new RDA carrier reference value: audio – audio belt (sb) |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 24/Nov/20 ] |
Agreed, this is a mod-inventory-storage change.
I'm not aware of one. I concur with your evaluation of the situation.
I exported the CSV definitions for both revisions of that file and compared them in an external tool. The only difference is the line endings they use. Those revisions only go back to April 2020. FOLIO defined it's list in June 2018 (from Zak Burke comment above). We don't know what changes have been made in the intervening time. Charlotte Whitt Do you know if this is a new entry since FOLIO initially defined it's set?
Do the RDA version their definitions? If they do, we could include that information as a property in the reference records. If not, we might find it challenging to infer those versions. In the latter case, we could record when the definition was last updated (not when it was last loaded into any given system). If this is a new value (to FOLIO at least), I don't think this is a bug. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 24/Nov/20 ] |
|
Marc Johnson - this ticket is about adding a new value (that's the work which is left on this original ticket, while original was wrongly assumed that an entered code for one of the values, was a FOLIO bug, but it's identified as a 5C specific bug). The Support SIG did talk about the ticket at yesterday's meeting and I'll update the description to follow the template for a story description. I'll mark this ticket as Draft, while as you can see in the comments above, I have asked Felix Hemme to verify in the official RDA Tool kit the date for when to expect to have this value implemented according to the RDA specifications. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 24/Nov/20 ] |
Thank you for confirming that and changing this to a story. |
| Comment by Felix Hemme [ 24/Nov/20 ] |
|
Charlotte Whitt According to http://www.rdaregistry.info/termList/RDACarrierType/#1070 audio belt has a status of "published". It's listed in the currrent (non Beta) RDA Toolkit as well as in the beta toolkit. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 24/Nov/20 ] |
|
Thanks Felix Hemme Laura Daniels, maybe we could discuss with the MM-SIG, if we could establish a standing working group, which in a structured way tracked all planned RDA changes, which we should account for in Inventory? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 31/Mar/21 ] |
|
Are folks expecting this new value to be included in existing systems when tenants are upgraded to a newer version of mod-inventory-storage? |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 15/Apr/21 ] |
|
Hi Marc Johnson usually we have updates of reference values as an update also for older versions of mod-inventory-storage, correct? What about we stick to this procedure, until versioning of reference values, have been implemented. Does that makes sense? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 15/Apr/21 ] |
Most of the time that turns out to be the case, IIRC
I'm not sure what procedure you are referring to. If you want to make it a standard activity for this kind of work, I'm more than happy to do that. Please include it in the scope of future story definitions. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 06/Jun/21 ] |
|
Manual test in FOLIO Snapshot, version instance-formats 2.0, using Chrome. All looks good. Thanks Alen. I'll close the ticket as done. |