[FOLIO-3259] [PoC] Add a user type to hide tenant users Created: 02/Aug/21 Updated: 12/Aug/21 Resolved: 12/Aug/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Mikhail Fokanov | Assignee: | Mikhail Fokanov |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | CP: sprint 120 | ||||||||
| Story Points: | 3 | ||||||||
| Development Team: | Core: Platform | ||||||||
| Description |
| Comments |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 10/Aug/21 ] |
|
Mikhail Fokanov Deborah Jakubs
What are the other types?
Should this filter also be applied everywhere else that the system presents or uses users e.g. in the find user plugins or when the circulation back end is fetching a user as part of a check out / check in? |
| Comment by Mikhail Fokanov [ 10/Aug/21 ] |
After creation of the Jira, it was disscused with Core-platform team (including Jakub Skoczen) that it makes more sense to leave user type blank for simple users and use the "system_..." type only for newly created system users.
It is for the corresponding POs to decide. Before this story there was no ability to filter them out. For now there is such ability. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 10/Aug/21 ] |
By blank do you mean not defined or an empty string? Does that mean we need to filter out users when the type is not system?
How do the relevant POs know they need to make that decision? Has this model been discussed with them or the user management SIG?
Does that mean this work has been done and is in the mainline code? |