[FOLIO-2442] Name Changes to Existing Reference Records Created: 04/Feb/20 Updated: 03/Feb/21 Resolved: 03/Feb/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Marc Johnson | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | potential-decision | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Over time, the names for the canonical reference records will change. For new installations, it seems clear that the records loaded should be the latest definition. For existing installations, it seems more complicated. Examples I think we have two broad examples:
Questions Should records in existing installations be changed
I think we also need to decide what we consider changed. Do we consider the records changed if the total count of records has changed (e.g. a record has been added or deleted)? Or do we consider each record at a time and consider it changed if the record's name has changed? Could this depend upon specific information in the records, e.g. the `source` property. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 03/Feb/21 ] |
|
Closing as is superseded by the the ongoing work by on upgrading reference records cc: VBar Craig McNally Jakub Skoczen Tod Olson Wayne Schneider |