[FOLIO-2359] Include source-record-manager and source-record-storage to core modules Created: 19/Nov/19 Updated: 03/Jun/20 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Ruslan Lavrov | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||
| Development Team: | Core: Platform | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Should include module source-record-manager (with interfaces: source-manager-job-executions, source-manager-records) and module source-record-storage (with interfaces: source-storage-snapshots, source-storage-records, source-storage-batch) to core modules. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 19/Nov/19 ] |
|
Hi Jakub Skoczen Please see the above task and description. I think |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 26/Nov/19 ] |
|
Hi Jakub Skoczen For the Q4 release, will you want to move SRS and SRM in Core, or just leave them in Complete? For now, they are only included in Platform-Complete, not Platform-Core |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 27/Dec/19 ] |
|
Linked to
Ian Hardy: would it make sense to move SRS/SRM to platform Core around the same time that MODPUBSUB is added? |