[FOLIO-1872] Several modules have a submodule configuration that refer to a non-existent branch of mod-users Created: 14/Mar/19 Updated: 03/Jun/20 Resolved: 15/Mar/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | John Malconian | Assignee: | Adam Dickmeiss |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | platform-backlog | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||
| Development Team: | Core: Platform | ||||||||
| Description |
|
mod-inventory-storage, mod-login, mod-permissions, and possibly other modules have a submodule configuration that points to a non-existent branch of mod-users that was deleted (modusers-103-load-reference). This is/will cause builds in Jenkins to fail. I've temporarily restored the missing branch in Github, however, the submodule configuration for each of these modules needs to be updated to presumably point to the master branch of mod-users. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Adam Dickmeiss [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
So sorry.. Because the modusers-103 branch was squashed the pointer became invalid. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
Out of curiosity, why do these modules have a submodule for mod-users? Are we using it to define the users referenced in the sample records? |
| Comment by Adam Dickmeiss [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
Yes. 300 sample user records. And the userId's have to match up. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
Does that mean that some of the sample records for mod-inventory-storage are generated based upon the user records in the submodule? |
| Comment by Adam Dickmeiss [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
Yes |
| Comment by Adam Dickmeiss [ 15/Mar/19 ] |
|
The 3 modules have updated their mod-users pointer |