[FOLIO-1830] review 'platform-work-performance' tests Created: 27/Feb/19 Updated: 03/Jun/20 Resolved: 04/Mar/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Jakub Skoczen | Assignee: | Hongwei Ji |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | platform-backlog | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Core: Platform - Sprint 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Core: Platform | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
To ensure each test (workflow) is using only a single API call in the thread loop. It is allowed to use multiple API call during the test preparation phase (e.g to lookup initial arguments) but not in the benchmarked loop. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 28/Feb/19 ] |
|
Hongwei Ji can we change what is displayed in URI column in the Performance Report table? Rather than loosely structured names like Performance_ GET query requests by itemId and a lot of other stuff can we simply log the exact method, path and parameters? E.g GET /request-storage/requests/query=itemId=1234? |
| Comment by Hongwei Ji [ 28/Feb/19 ] |
|
Sure, Jakub Skoczen, we can do that. Also we will address some other comments you mentioned in
|
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 04/Mar/19 ] |
|
Hongwei Ji Eric Valuk Thanks. Also – one more question:
but looking at the results (attached as a screenshot) I don't see the following tests:
are they missing? |
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 04/Mar/19 ] |
|
We'll created three seperate tickets to cover tasks that came out of the review. |
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 04/Mar/19 ] |
|
Eric Valuk Hongwei Ji Guys I have added
|
| Comment by Hongwei Ji [ 04/Mar/19 ] |
|
Will do. Meanwhile Jakub Skoczen I will close this ticket. |
| Comment by Jakub Skoczen [ 05/Mar/19 ] |
|
Thanks Hongwei Ji. I see that you bumped the number of users to 50. Can we please hold off making any additional changes to the configuration of those tests? I'd like first to see what is the performance of looking up instance by id on this particular machine and data set (
|
| Comment by Hongwei Ji [ 05/Mar/19 ] |
|
Eric Valuk did that last week. Jakub Skoczen, what number do you prefer to use? |