[FOLIO-1680] Standardise JIRA issue links Created: 03/Jan/19 Updated: 25/Jan/23 Resolved: 25/Jan/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | FOLIO |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Marc Johnson | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | potential-decision | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
In order for it to be easy to understand the relationships between linked issues in JIRA, we could standardise on the wording of the relationships we use often. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 16/Jan/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema Jakub Skoczen I've noticed that different teams are using different relationships for describing dependencies (for example,
|