All work

Select view

Select search mode

 
18 of 18

Retire mod-kb-ebsco (Ruby) project

Done

Description

Now that mod-kb-ebsco-java project has been released with Q1 and replaces functionality that was in mod-kb-ebsco (ruby module) – we should retire the older mod-kb-ebsco ruby version project.

#devops or #releases channels may have instructions on what steps are needed

Should mod-kb-ebsco-java project be renamed to mod-kb-ebsco?

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Story Points

Development Team

Spitfire

Fix versions

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created May 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM
Updated January 9, 2020 at 8:57 AM
Resolved January 9, 2020 at 8:57 AM

Activity

Show:

David CrossleyJanuary 6, 2020 at 6:27 AM

Done. The old repository is now "archived read-only" as explained in my comments above and at FOLIO-2251.

Peter MurrayDecember 20, 2019 at 4:02 PM

A new security advisory popped up for the old `mod-kb-ebsco` code.

David CrossleySeptember 11, 2019 at 1:09 AM

I added the new ticket FOLIO-2251 for the Core Platform Team to rename and archive, as explained in my previous comment above.

However, this current Sprint 72 is very busy, so it may need to wait.

Carole GodfreySeptember 10, 2019 at 1:22 PM
Edited

Sure I think that makes sense and
Would this be a good reference https://medium.com/maintainer-io/how-to-deprecate-a-repository-on-github-8f0ceb9155e for steps we should take to do this?
Also found this reference on archiving the repository
https://github.blog/2017-11-08-archiving-repositories/

Peter MurraySeptember 10, 2019 at 1:09 PM
Edited

: Is it okay if we mark this Ruby-based project as Deprecated in GitHub? It'll stop the security alerts in addition to signalling to others that the code is no longer used

and , what do you guys think?

TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs

Flag notifications