Done
Details
Reporter
Doug LoynesDoug LoynesPO Rank
0Release
Sunflower (R1 2025)Tech Design Ready
YesTestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: CasesTestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Details
Details
Reporter
Doug Loynes
Doug LoynesPO Rank
0
Release
Sunflower (R1 2025)
Tech Design Ready
Yes
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created June 22, 2023 at 10:24 AM
Updated October 31, 2024 at 8:56 AM
Resolved August 6, 2024 at 8:12 PM
Current situation or problem:
For the Thin Thread effort, this feature focuses on the cataloging workflow logistics when a cataloging technician has completed work on a resource description.
In scope
Save / Work in Progress - a cataloging technician must be able to save work completed on a resource description before it is shared or published
Delete - where the cataloging technician decides to remove/delete work previously completed (e.g. to avoid adding duplicate records to the catalog)
Out of scope
Publish - where a cataloging technician completes work on a resource description that doesn't require further review or editing of the description, the technician must have the ability to publish the description. NOTE: This was functionality was originally included within scope of the Thin Thread, but moved out of scope to manage timeline for releasing the Thin Thread.
Roles/responsibilities - for the Thin Thread, assume anyone working on a resource description in Marva / BIBFRAME is a cataloging technician. That is, additional role-based work required for completing a resource description will not be supported in Marva / BIBFRAME. Additionally, Marva / BIBFRAME will not enforce rules for determining if or when the technician's work on a resource description is complete
Notification - the Thin Thread will not need to create a specific queue for work that needs to be passed to senior catalogers. This functionality may be required for Day 1, but not for the Thin Thread
Authority lookup - the technician will be required to inspect and verify certain authority entries in a resource description. That work is outside the scope of this feature.
Use case(s)
Work in Progress - Success
Library technician completes work on a resource description
The technician is not authorized to publish the description
Technician selects some type of 'complete' option to save work
Resource description saved in BIBFRAME
Resource description updated in FOLIO
Proposed solution/stories
Links to additional info
Questions
When a senior cataloger must review / update work started by a library technician, the senior cataloger will do so within FOLIO. What kind of 'hooks' - if any - must be included in the resource description, so that the catalogers can continue work in FOLIO?