Implement sets CRUD for OAI-PMH - backend work

Description

This is a UXPROD-2406 spillover from 2020 R3 with the backend work for implementing sets for OAI-PMH.

Currently, OAI-PMH allows selective harvesting only by date.
With sets implementation, it is going to provide an opportunity to harvest by different fields, e.g. location, record type, discovery suppression etc.

Sets configuration should be flexible enough and available via user interface, so that librarians can form their own sets structure. Separate page “Sets” in Settings->OAI-PMH is to be created. Here sets can be searched, viewed, created, duplicated, modified and deleted, according to the user’s permissions (see designs attached).

More information on sets can be found by link http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm#Set.

Use cases:
I would like to be able to combine a bunch of locations into a single set. We have an associated K-12 school with its own library as part of our structure. I would like to harvest just the K-12 library data. I would like to create a set that includes all of the K-12 locations and not a separate set for 200 locations.

Special collections libraries might want to contribute a set of their records to a union catalog. Perhaps that might be based on subject. It would definitely be done for all records of items that have digitizations (think DPLA or Europeana). Or even just to match the metadata records with their own digital assets management systems, for combined display in discovery systems, since DAMS often have much less robust descriptive metadata.

Questions:

  1. Is selecting one location going to resolve the problem?

  2. Can multiple sets be used during one harvest?

  3. Which of the following is the correct approach for saving setSpecs:

  • <setSpec>test</setSpec>

  • <setSpec>mycustomentry</setSpec><setSpec>audio-role-only</setSpec>

  • <setSpec>mycustomentry:audio-role-only</setSpec>

Priority

Fix versions

Development Team

Firebird

Assignee

Solution Architect

Parent Field Value

None

Parent Status

None

Attachments

2

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Magda ZacharskaDecember 21, 2023 at 7:21 AM
Edited

Changing the  release assignment as the implementation requires further discussion with LC.

Oleksii PetrenkoMarch 1, 2023 at 1:34 PM

Hello . Is it possible to keep single fix version for feature? I removed Q-release. I guess that separate feature for Q-release would be great. Sorry for inconvenience. Thank you

Details

Reporter

PO Rank

0

Front End Estimate

Out of scope

Back End Estimate

XXXL: 30-45 days

Back End Estimator

Back-End Confidence factor

20%

Release

Not Scheduled

Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)

R4

Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)

R4

Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020)

R4

Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020)

R4

Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020)

R2

Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)

R2

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created December 7, 2020 at 1:10 AM
Updated last month
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs