Manage users ability to view and work with Acquisitions records based on assigned "Acquisition Unit(s)"
Description
Priority
Fix versions
Development Team
Assignee

Solution Architect
Parent Field Value
Parent Status
defines
is cloned by
relates to
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity

Michael ArthurMay 30, 2019 at 4:00 PM
thank you for the clear explanation. This seems doable for us with some planning. I don't think we would need teams as a go live.
We may need to talk this through a little at the f2f in June. You are correct that current permissions within acquisitions are not impacted by branch libraries because all acquisitions/fund management functions are managed within this department. However, there are levels of permission with acquisitions. Acquisitions/serials managers and I can approve invoices, and allocate and transfer funds while other staff can only create orders, receive and generate an invoice. Would this distinction be made by individual permissions to by having two teams?
Also, right now our Health Sciences Library on campus does use Voyager for cataloging. However, they do not use it for acquisitions/fund management. I am not sure how they will be handled in FOLIO but it appears that we would simply not give them any permissions.
Also, right now in Voyager we are not able to give users the ability to see the Materials Ledger (state money) without also giving them view access to the Gift and Endowment Ledger. Since we have to be guarded about the G&E ledger we are not able to give liaisons access to the Materials Ledger. I am hopeful that in FOLIO we can give view only access at the ledger level so that this is no longer a problem.

Ann-Marie BreauxMay 30, 2019 at 3:32 PMEdited
The biggest use for teams is when certain people need a subset of permissions within a standard permission - e.g. they can create orders, but only for Main, not for Law or Med or Campus B. They can spend funds, but only for Main, not for Law or Med or Campus B. If all of Alabama's acq staff can create orders and spend money for all locations, then you may not need teams.

Michael ArthurMay 30, 2019 at 3:17 PM
we discussed this recently in the Acq small group. I am still not clear on the purpose of assigned teams vs. just giving users permission to various functions. Often times the permissions given to individuals goes across teams that are designed to address functionality. So, there may be some staff in cataloging that have acq permissions but they do not need what the acq team has.
I just need more info.

Ann-Marie BreauxMay 29, 2019 at 5:41 AM
Key thing for Chalmers will be able to separate out the work for Main, Architecture and Math acquisitions units. It will only relate to orders, since they're not using funds or invoices in FOLIO.
Marie WidigsonMay 28, 2019 at 1:25 PM
Hi Not exactly sure how this is intended to work. Please get back to us if you have any questions. In fact, I believe that understands our needs for "teams" maybe even better than we do .
Details
Reporter
Dennis BridgesDennis BridgesPO Rank
96.4Estimation Notes and Assumptions
Will need to updated estimates once a clearer approach is defined for implementation. Will this be limited to Create? When will permissions need to be enforced.Analysis Estimate
Medium < 5 daysFront End Estimate
XL < 15 daysBack End Estimate
XL < 15 daysRank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020)
R4Rank: 5Colleges (ERM Jun 2020)
R1Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)
R1Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)
R5Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019)
R1Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020)
R1Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021)
R1Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020)
R4Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)
R1Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020)
R4TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: CasesTestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Details
Details
Reporter

Purpose: Use teams as a way of managing work with related records within a given tenant.
Acceptance criteria:
Governs ability to work with Orders
Governs ability to work with Invoices
Governs ability to work with Funds
Governs ability to work with Organization split (May need multiple teams)