Analytical records; bound width - linking multiple instance records to a single holdings records (and the reverse, multiple holdings to a single instance record), part one

Description

Cataloguing format of
1) Analytical records (= analyzed separate bibliographic records for a work published as a collection) and
2) bound with records (= bound-with monographs are instances of two or more independent works)

Linking multiple instance records to a single holdings records (and the reverse, multiple holdings to a single instance record)

Source: https://discuss.folio.org/t/multipart-monographs/1347

NOTE:

  • part 1: instance to instance linking (Q3, 2018)

  • part 2: item to item linking (Q1, 2019)

Priority

Fix versions

Development Team

Prokopovych

Assignee

Solution Architect

Parent Field Value

None

Parent Status

None

Attachments

1

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Cate Boerema October 12, 2018 at 8:05 AM

Awesome. I just linked them up and added the new "split" label to this feature to indicate it was split. This label will allow us to see how many of the features we release each quarter needed to be split (meaning wasn't fully completed).

Thanks for taking care of this, ! I love it when release features grow with just a little JIRA maintenance

Charlotte Whitt October 11, 2018 at 12:25 PM

Hi @Cate - just did the split etc.

Charlotte Whitt October 11, 2018 at 12:09 PM

Hi - sounds good!

Lisa Sjögren October 10, 2018 at 10:44 AM

HI ! I'm not sure I see how "linking multiple instance records to a single holdings record" relates to the hierarchical instance model.
However, having taken a look at the GBV FOLIO environment, I think that the functionality already implemented in Q3 should be sufficient for Chalmers at go-live.

Cate Boerema October 10, 2018 at 8:25 AM

, I think you were going to split this feature into two parts: instance-level bound withs and item-level bound withs. As I understood it, the instance-level bound withs were complete (I think they were completed in Q3, no?). Item-level are still to be developed.

Do I have this right?

Done

Details

Reporter

Analysis Estimate

Large < 10 days

Analysis Estimator

Front End Estimate

Large < 10 days

Front End Estimator

Front-End Confidence factor

High

Back End Estimate

Large < 10 days

Back End Estimator

Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)

R1

Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)

R1

Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019)

R1

Rank: BNCF (MVP Feb 2020)

R1

Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020)

R1

Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021)

R1

Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020)

R1

Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)

R1

Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020)

R1

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created January 18, 2018 at 10:48 PM
Updated May 4, 2022 at 12:55 PM
Resolved October 11, 2018 at 12:14 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs