Implement presence or absence searches for indicators
Description
Environment
None
Potential Workaround
None
CSP Request Details
None
CSP Approved
None
CSP Rejection Details
None
Attachments
2
clones
defines
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Show:
Jenn Colt May 7, 2021 at 11:34 AMEdited
Looks good.
Tested with
{
"fieldsSearchExpression": "099.ind2 is 'present' and 245.a ^= 'New York'"
}
{
"fieldsSearchExpression": "099.ind2 is 'present'"
}
{
"fieldsSearchExpression": "099.ind1 is 'absent'"
}
Pavlo Smahin May 6, 2021 at 2:06 PM
, please verify that it works as expected.
Jenn Colt April 30, 2021 at 1:00 PM
Yes that's correct.
Pavlo Smahin April 30, 2021 at 12:37 PMEdited
Hi , could you clarify which state of an indicator makes it absent, please?
Is it the right assumption that indicators that contain "\" are absent indicators on the screenshot below?
Done
Details
Details
Assignee
Jenn ColtReporter
Jenn ColtPriority
P3Story Points
3
Sprint
None
Development Team
Spitfire
Fix versions
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created April 9, 2021 at 11:57 AM
Updated June 11, 2021 at 12:07 PM
Resolved May 7, 2021 at 11:35 AM
Purpose/Overview:
To allow the user to search the for the presence of absence of indicators related to MARC data fields
Requirements/Scope:
Allows the user to search for the presence or absence of the indicators of a given MARC data field.
Approach:
Acceptance criteria:
Evaluate if results are returned in under a minute against a collection of 10 million SRS records. If not create other tickets as needed.
Results should be paginated
Offset and limit parameters will determine pagination
Results should contain a JSON response with keys: records (array of associated instance UUIDS), recordCount (integer)
A search with no results should have an empty records array and count of 0
When passing parameter suppressed=true then records that are suppressed from discovery will be included in the results